Instead, the IRS unilaterally (by malicious intent or inadvertence or incompetence) mis-interpreted the meaning of exclusively to mean "primarily". That opens the door to whether or not a group engages in 49% political (tax exemption) or 51% political (no tax exemption), and thus engaging in not enough charitable activities.
Can The People file a Writ of Mandamus to compel IRS to implement statutes as written, not with wording changes to suit them. At issue is the statutory wording, that tax exemption only follows exclusive
This kind of Writ has been, or is in process of being filed. See http://www.pgdc.com/pgdc/watchdog-group-files-suit-reform-501c4-regulations
and Support His Writ of Mandamus.
As to Writ of Mandamus
28 U.S.C.A. § 1651(a) provides that courts "may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law."
1.1 Effectuate a retroactive adjustment to erroneously granted tax exemptions. This would take help eradicate the deficit and should meet with bipartisan support.
1.2 Halt all unilateral IRS interpretation that, on the face of the terms, shows substantial deviation (deviates! deviates!) from plain meaning. From this moment on, all applications actually approved to date shall extinguish on September 1, 2013 and be subject to further review.